11/11/2023 0 Comments Bill murray ghostbusters![]() Venkman also works as the unelected spokesman of the Ghostbusters. If Peter wasn't Peter, all of NYC might've turned into Gozer's permanent playground of destruction. ![]() He might see science as a way to hustle for cash, but it's his way of looking things that actually proves to be the inspiration for the Ghostbusters. Venkman is a waste of space, just remember that there'd be no Ghostbusters without his crazy ideas. The franchise rights alone will make us rich beyond our wildest dreams. Professional paranormal investigations and eliminations. PETER: Will you guys relax? We are on the threshold of establishing the indispensable defense science of the next decade. He's the one that talks them into starting the Ghostbusters with pep talks like this: the whole idea of ghostbusting as a business. While they're good at researching, inventing things, and all that good stuff, Pete is the guy that comes up with the ideas. When it comes down to it, Ray and Egon need Peter as much as he needs them. The real question is if Pete is a total know-nothing, why do Ray and Egon bother to keep around? Idea Man Later, when the ghostbusting business is booming, Pete relies on his buddies' gadgets and scientific knowhow to get the ghosts busted. When the movie first kicks off, Peter doesn't even believe in ghosts and pokes fun at Ray and Egon's paranormal obsession. Yeager might be one of the first "bad guys" we meet in the movie, but he's absolutely right about Venkman. Your methods are sloppy, and your conclusions are highly questionable. ![]() Your theories are the worst kind of popular tripe. You, however, seem to regard science as some kind of dodge or hustle. Venkman, we believe that the purpose of science is to serve mankind. Check out this quote where Yeager cuts Peter down to size:ĭEAN YEAGER: Dr. Peter Venkman's free ride at Columbia is yanked away by Dean Yeager, who totally has Pete's number. (Academics everywhere have probably questioned that premise, but anyway.)Įarly in the movie, Dr. The truth is that our protagonist is a bad scientist who seems to have only gotten a doctorate in parapsychology because it was an easy way to get a free ride at a university. It looks like Ghostbusters 3 is still a very long way off.For a Ghostbuster, Venkman sure doesn't know much about busting ghosts. So we're no further ahead, and possibly moving backwards: still no official studio greenlight, and now, seemingly, a script in a state of turnaround. the guys are funny and I miss Rick Moranis and Annie Potts and Danny Aykroyd. Murray concedes in the interview that he's actually finding the whole saga "irritating" (so that's actually a small spanner right there), but does ultimately still seem tempted from a nostalgic angle: "Maybe it'd be fun to do. But, says Murray, "These guys that were supposedly the writers that were going to do it, they wrote a film that came out and people saw the film and went, 'We're not going to do it after all, are we?'" Hollywood is harsh. ![]() Year One and The Office (US) writers Lee Eisenberg and Gene Stupnitsky had been working on drafts of Ghostbusters 3 that seemed to be getting everyone's approval. That at least is the message coming from Bill Murray himself, who's been talking to Coming Soon on the Get Low press junket.Īccording to Dr Venkman, it seems part of the recent trouble afflicting the on/off, stop/start, are they/aren't they second sequel, is the under-performance of Year One, Harold Ramis' 2009 comedy disappointment. Don't believe all you hear about a recalcitrant Bill Murray throwing spanners around left right and centre in the works of Ghostbusters 3. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |